It is fairly obvious Obama and Congress rushed through H.R. 347
in order to curtail demonstrations that will undoubtedly occur during
both Democrat and Republican conventions this summer. Also known as the
“Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011,” the
bill makes it a felony to disrupt or protest at any place or event
attended by any person with secret service protection. “Current law makes it illegal to enter or remain in an area where
certain government officials (more particularly, those with Secret
Service protection) will be visiting temporarily if and only if the
person knows it’s illegal to enter the restricted area but does so
anyway,” Michigan Rep. Justin Amash
wrote on his Facebook page. “[H.R. 347] expands current law to make it a
crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even
if the person does not know it’s illegal to be in that area and has no
reason to suspect it’s illegal.” Amash, Paul Broun, a Georgia Republican, and Ron Paul were the lone
dissenting voices opposed to this bill, which is being called the “First Amendment Rights Eradication Act”
designed specifically to counter the Occupy movement and other
political groups opposed to the bankster regime in control of the
Congress and the presidency. Democrats have characterized opposition to the bill as “a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing.”
Gene Howington,
a guest blogger on law professor Jonathan Turley’s blog, contends that
the government deliberately made the language of H.R. 347 vague and
overly broad. Howington writes that “it seems to be a trend that vague
or overly broad language could be fairly described as being purposefully
adopted allowing ‘wiggle room’ for Federal authorities to potentially
abuse civil and human rights under the color of authority.”
While the recently enacted and also vaguely worded NDAA “poses a
threat to your 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment rights, the newest attack of
vague language is aimed at your 1st Amendment rights of Freedom of
Speech, Freedom of Assembly and Freedom to Petition,” Howington notes.
“As currently worded, it might as well have been called the ‘Federal
We’re Too Important To Be Annoyed By Your Protest Act of 2011′ or (as
described by Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), one of the few Representatives to
vote against the bill) the ‘First Amendment Rights Eradication Act’
because it effectively outlaws protests near people who are ‘authorized’
to be protected by the Secret Service.”
In 1998, Bill Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive 62 establishing the National Special Security Events,
or NSSE, a directive making the Secret Service responsible for security
at designated events, including presidential nominating conventions.
Other events under NSEE include summits of world leaders, meetings of
international organizations, and presidential inaugurations. In other
words, with the passage of this bill, it will now be a felony to protest
the G20 and globalist “trade” summits and other neoliberal confabs
where international banksters and their minions plot our future behind
closed doors.
Such a draconian restriction of the First Amendment is another step
in an effort to outlaw all protest against the government, especially at
events where the controllers discuss and finalize their plans to
implement world government and a centralized global banking system. The
global elite have repeatedly demonstrated their animosity toward the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Taking down the First Amendment –
in addition to the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and most importantly the Second –
under the bogus and contrived aegis of a manufactured war on terror
amply reveals what they have a mind: a gulag panopticon where resistance
is not only futile, but illegal, and where the slaves are disarmed and
powerless to effectuate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment