Syria being punished for Iran ties

Syria is to go the Libyan way, with NATO members planning “direct military intervention,” says Nikolay Patrushev, Russia’s Security Council secretary. Russia opposes the Western drive to dismiss Assad and urges political dialogue in the country. In an interview to the Russian newspaper Kommersant, Nikolay Patrushev said that foreign military intervention into Syria could soon become a reality.
“NATO members together with several Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, acting along the Libyan scenario, are intending to turn the current mediated interference in Syrian affairs into a direct military intervention,” Patrushev said.
According to the head of the Kremlin security body, this time France, Italy and the UK will not be major providers of attacking forces.
“It will probably be Turkey, which neighbors Syria and which till recently was its ally. Turkey is competing with Iran and has huge ambitions,” said Patrushev. “Damascus is to be persecuted not exactly for repressing the opposition, but because it is unwilling to sever ties with Tehran.”
Washington and Ankara are now assumed to be negotiating a “no-fly” zone over Syria to help Syrian armed insurgents, added Patrushev.

 

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov told Interfax there are clear signs that Western states want Bashar al-Assad out.
“Unfortunately the Western approach is fundamentally different from ours,” he said. “According to amendments [to draft UN resolution on Syria, proposed by Russia], made by them, their goal is clearly to achieve the dismissal of the Assad’s regime in Damascus.”
Gatilov added that, conversely, Russia's position excludes any intrusion into the country’s internal affairs from outside and calls for the conflicting sides to stop violence and begin to solve the problems politically. Russia will continue to negotiate the resolution in the next round of consultations, he said.
The official also noted that Russia supports actions of Arab League observers in the country.
“We believe that their work in Syria is a stabilizing factor which is helping find a political solution,” he said. “We are calling for the Arab observers to continue their stay in Syria and perform the mission prescribed by the mandate issued by the Arab League.”

­‘Syria project signals beginning of war on Iran’

Officials in Washington have always been explicit that their agenda in Syria is a regime change, says Aisling Byrne, a project coordinator with Conflicts Forum in Lebanon.
“It is part of the war on Iran, which has effectively started,” Byrne told RT. “The US have been very careful up till now to acknowledge any kind of violence that is being perpetrated by any others apart from the government forces in Syria. This is a project of regime change and it is within the context of a pro-democracy movement that armed protesters are now being contextualized.”
The strict pro-democracy narrative which surrounds reports on Syria in mass media is nothing but a propaganda tool, and the scale of the “propaganda war” has become “huge,” remarks Byrne. In this context, a coordinated international solution will be difficult to reach, as even the Arab League got split over the issue.